Does the presentation of information affect residents’ response to government communications?

Does the presentation of information affect residents’ response to government communications?

Project Summary

The ability of government to perform its core functions depends, in part, on how well it communicates with residents. Often, this happens through writing. In a series of studies, we found that residents are more likely to engage with more formal government communications, especially when they have low trust in government. This “Formality Effect” directly contradicts experts’ predictions about what attributes increase the efficacy of government communications.

Why is this issue important?

Trust in government is at a near historic low, and there are significant gaps between what the government asks residents to do and residents’ observed behavior. Behavioral science has become very influential in designing and testing methods of increasing response to written communications by targeting barriers to action. But most behaviorally-informed strategies focus on adjusting language and content. Less is known about how the presentation of information may affect residents’ response to government communications.

What are we doing?

We conducted two online studies using Amazon MTurk and, through collaborations with the Behavioral Insights Team and the California Policy Lab, four large-scale field experiments across different policy domains: voter registration, take-up of the Earned Income Tax Credit, enrollment in a local government program, and self-certification of small businesses. In each field experiment, residents were randomly assigned to receive either a formal or informal version of a mailer and the main outcome measured related to whether the resident took the desired action.

What have we learned?

Across six studies, we found that there exists a “Formality Effect” in government communications. Contrary to experts’ predictions, formal government communications are more effective at influencing resident behavior than informal government communications. One possible reason for this is that formality operates as a heuristic for credibility and importance. Importantly, this effect is strongest for people who have low trust in government.

What comes next?

We have incorporated the findings from this project into other evaluations that center on government communications. Similarly, these findings can be used to inform the design of government communications across policy contexts.